Argument Mining on Twitter: Arguments, Facts and Sources
نویسندگان
چکیده
Social media collect and spread on the Web personal opinions, facts, fake news and all kind of information users may be interested in. Applying argument mining methods to such heterogeneous data sources is a challenging open research issue, in particular considering the peculiarities of the language used to write textual messages on social media. In addition, new issues emerge when dealing with arguments posted on such platforms, such as the need to make a distinction between personal opinions and actual facts, and to detect the source disseminating information about such facts to allow for provenance verification. In this paper, we apply supervised classification to identify arguments on Twitter, and we present two new tasks for argument mining, namely facts recognition and source identification. We study the feasibility of the approaches proposed to address these tasks on a set of tweets related to the Grexit and Brexit news topics.
منابع مشابه
DART: a Dataset of Arguments and their Relations on Twitter
The problem of understanding the stream of messages exchanged on social media such as Facebook and Twitter is becoming a major challenge for automated systems. The tremendous amount of data exchanged on these platforms as well as the specific form of language adopted by social media users constitute a new challenging context for existing argument mining techniques. In this paper, we describe a ...
متن کاملDesign and Test of the Real-time Text mining dashboard for Twitter
One of today's major research trends in the field of information systems is the discovery of implicit knowledge hidden in dataset that is currently being produced at high speed, large volumes and with a wide variety of formats. Data with such features is called big data. Extracting, processing, and visualizing the huge amount of data, today has become one of the concerns of data science scholar...
متن کاملMining Fine-grained Argument Elements
The paper discusses the architecture and development of an Argument Workbench, which supports an analyst in reconstructing arguments from across textual sources. The workbench takes a semi-automated, interactive approach searching in a corpus for fine-grained argument elements, which are concepts and conceptual patterns in expressions that are associated with argumentation schemes. The expressi...
متن کاملFormalising arguments about norms
In most attempts to model legal systems as formal argumentation systems, legal norms are viewed as an argumentation’s system inference rules. Since in formal argumentation systems inference rules are generally assumed to be fixed and independent from the inferences they enable, this approach fails to capture the dialectical connection between norms and arguments, where on the one hand legal arg...
متن کاملA High-Performance Model based on Ensembles for Twitter Sentiment Classification
Background and Objectives: Twitter Sentiment Classification is one of the most popular fields in information retrieval and text mining. Millions of people of the world intensity use social networks like Twitter. It supports users to publish tweets to tell what they are thinking about topics. There are numerous web sites built on the Internet presenting Twitter. The user can enter a sentiment ta...
متن کامل